<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://ohmygov.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Durbin: Senate should not seat Burris, despite Illinois court ruling</title><link>http://ohmygov.com/blogs/general_news/archive/2009/01/12/durbin-senate-should-not-seat-burris-despite-illinois-court-ruling.aspx</link><description>The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled that no law requires Secretary of State Jesse White to sign the appointment made by Governor Rod Blagojevich of Roland Burris to replace President-elect Barack Obama in the Senate. Despite this, U.S. Senator Dick Durbin</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Durbin: Senate should not seat Burris, despite Illinois court ruling</title><link>http://ohmygov.com/blogs/general_news/archive/2009/01/12/durbin-senate-should-not-seat-burris-despite-illinois-court-ruling.aspx#4462</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:30:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0818fdd8-5679-476d-9536-9a7a82355f32:4462</guid><dc:creator>Burr Deming</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A vigorous debate on the legal considerations has been waged &amp;lt;a hef=&amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.FairAndUNbalanced.com?http://www.testimoanials.com/blog/blog1.php/2009/01/07/can-the-senate-keep-burris-out%22%3Ehere%3C/a%3E" rel="nofollow" target="_new"&gt;www.fairandunbalanced.com&lt;/a&gt;. Your deeper question on motivation is ultimately unknowable, even by Democrats in the Senate. One neglected aspect has to do with &amp;lt;a hef=&amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.FairAndUNbalanced.com?http://www.testimoanials.com/blog/blog1.php/2009/01/02/how-roland-burris-came-to-sell-his-soul-%22%3EBurris" rel="nofollow" target="_new"&gt;www.fairandunbalanced.com&lt;/a&gt; himself, who tried to get a trio of obviously innocent men executed in order to appear tough on crime during a political campaign. That&amp;#39;s an aside but, I think, a powerful aside.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good post. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://ohmygov.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>