<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://ohmygov.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rumors on the Hill: Omnibus Bill to hit the floor today!</title><link>http://ohmygov.com/blogs/general_news/archive/2008/09/24/rumors-on-the-hill-omnibus-bill-to-hit-the-floor-today.aspx</link><description>Who would have expected the acceleration of the market crash during the critical appropriations cycle? Further, who could have predicted an administration scheme to prevent the country from further economic turmoil with a $700 billion dollar bail out</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Rumors on the Hill: Omnibus Bill to hit the floor today!</title><link>http://ohmygov.com/blogs/general_news/archive/2008/09/24/rumors-on-the-hill-omnibus-bill-to-hit-the-floor-today.aspx#3165</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:58:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0818fdd8-5679-476d-9536-9a7a82355f32:3165</guid><dc:creator>Flip Side</dc:creator><description>Can we get some perspective here? Not every earmark is a Bridge to Nowhere. Some help schools in need, create literacy programs, or save local clinics that provide essential services to low-income constituents (i.e. constituents who elected their congressman or senator to do those kinds of things for the community). Yes, we have to stand up to wasteful spending, but we also need reporting that clarifies the difference between bad earmarks and good ones. &lt;img src="http://ohmygov.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3165" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>