<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://ohmygov.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Boring but important: Senate passes 3.9 percent civilian pay raise</title><link>http://ohmygov.com/blogs/general_news/archive/2008/07/15/boring-but-important-senate-passes-3-9-percent-civilian-pay-raise.aspx</link><description>In defiance to the administration&amp;#39;s support of the federal workforce to provide a meager 2.9 percent raise for civilian employees next year, and a 3.4 percent raise for those in the military, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved a spending</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>re: Boring but important: Senate passes 3.9 percent civilian pay raise</title><link>http://ohmygov.com/blogs/general_news/archive/2008/07/15/boring-but-important-senate-passes-3-9-percent-civilian-pay-raise.aspx#2291</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:14:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0818fdd8-5679-476d-9536-9a7a82355f32:2291</guid><dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator><description>A 3.9% pay raise, if all civilian government employees worked 40 weeks for eight dollars an hour and took two weeks off a year (I fear that this is a rather conservative estimate since most probably earn far more than $8/hour), would mean that taaxpayers need to shell out $1,560,000,000 more per year.  That is one billion, five hundred sixty million dollars.  Do federal employees really need this or is this another example of the government&amp;#39;s inablity to do with less.&lt;img src="http://ohmygov.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2291" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>