
A guiding handout?
The Associated Press reported yesterday that the
Administration for Children and Families, a department of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been using a
math not commonly taught in public schools. According to the AP one such numerical miracle occurred in Georgia
where the administration counted 935 jobs saved by stimulus money. Impressive until you find out they only have 508 employees.
The rest of us might think a straightforward headcount of
people you didn’t layoff because of the stimulus would be the best way to find
out how many jobs were saved. But
that isn’t how the government directed them to do it. Instead they developed an interesting mathematical exercise
that clearly was beyond some individuals capabilities.
The reason the feds are in the business of creating math
puzzles (outside of the “to be expected” budget boondoggling) is that they
truly believe that providing somebody with a raise is equivalent to saving a
job, or at least a 1.84% of a job. “If I give you a raise, it is going to save a portion of your job,” said
HHS spokesman
Luis Rosero. But perhaps they
weren’t as clear with their instructions as they needed to be considering the
results.
According to the AP some Head Start programs counted every
raise given as a job saved. Then
there is the Bergen County Community Action Program in Hackensack, NJ, who received $213,000 in stimulus money
that they gave out as raises to existing employees and then reported 85 jobs
saved. Director of the Southwest
Georgia Community Action Council Myrtis
Mulkey-Ndawula said that “it was confusing at best, but we followed the
instructions we were given.” This
is the person who multiplied 508 by 1.84 to reach 935 jobs saved.
“It’s a glitch in the system,” said
Ben Allen, the research director of the National Head Start
Association. “There was some
misunderstanding among some in the Head Start community about completely the
reporting requirements.”
That may seem like a vast understatement but in fact getting
an accurate count of the effects of stimulus money is tricky. Steven
Davis, a University of Chicago economics professor says it may take a while
to get a correct figure. “We will
probably have a better sense two years down the road, after a number of careful
studies. But even then, there will
be lots of arguments.”