Follow OhMyGov! on  OhMyGov on Facebook

  JOIN  or  LOGIN    ALSO ON OMG! : GET SOCIAL
731207

USGS helps endangered species without hurting taxpayers

But then there's the $3.4 million turtle tunnels...

By Timothy Page Aug 07 2009, 03:04 PM

Tracked by DNA testing

Kim Keating, USGS

Tracked by DNA testing

The U.S. Geological Survey, best known as the makers of those squiggly topographic maps, has recently uncorked a few new tools to help protect endangered and at-risk species.

While massive herds of stimulus dollars are being shepherded into suspect projects, the USGS is doing good work within the confines of its annual budget.

In the seafood section, the agency has deployed techniques to restore critically endangered freshwater mussels to their native habitats by raising them in laboratories and then releasing them into the wild. It is also monitoring methods that let researchers discover new freshwater habitats for sea turtles in the Everglades National Park, which is essential to the survival of the endangered species.

On the meat side of the aisle, the USGS is using DNA testing to track grizzly bear movement and habitats. And in the salad department, the agency is conducting innovative research to reduce the threats and restore the habitats of unique, endangered and threatened plant species found only on California’s Channel Islands.

Highlights of USGS research on endangered plants and animals done in partnership with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service is published in the Endangered Species Bulletin (pdf). Paper copies (environment hater!) are available through the USGS office of communications, and you can bet there will be more issues of the bulletin considering that just a portion of recent USGS research is addressed in this volume. Every year the agency monitors on average of 150 threatened, endangered or candidate species.

The environment is important, of course, but do we really want to read about all the money the government is spending on the beasts of the land while our own economy plummets into the abyss? Stories such as $3.4 million in stimulus money awarded to a biologist for turtle tunnels don’t do much to inspire confidence, and threaten to undermine the ecological efforts elsewere. 

The conservationist merits of the bridges and tunnels built for turtles near U.S. Route 27 just north of Tallahassee, Fla. can be debated until the turtles finally do come home. But the project has garnered attention from lawmakers who see it among the 100 worst projects in the recent stimulus bill.

The poor turtles have not had a good track record of crossing the road that skirts Lake Jackson, as some 9,000 have been found dead in the past three years. But government bailouts also don’t have a good track record of pleasing taxpayers, whether it is turtles we’re talking about or the automobiles that run them over. If turtles had the concept of following signs and looking both ways before they cross the street, reactions to the turtle works may be different.

Fortunately, the USGS has shown that it can use its resources it usually receives every year without making taxpayer money extinct. Funding for the USGS comes via the annual Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill. And Rachel Muir, who has the formidable title of “USGS Imperiled Species Coordinator,” notes just how important it is to fund and develop new technologies for species survival.

“Once a species is lost, it is lost forever,” Muir said. “Science is the best tool we have for understanding what plants and animals need to survive—and human survival directly depends on the well-being of plants and animals.”

 

Read More: Interior (DOI), Fish And Wildlife Service (FWS), Leveraging Resources, Energy And Environment, Good Gov

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

Roger Belair
August 7, 2009 4:46 PM

The stimulus money for the transportation enhancement project along US 27 was not "awarded to a biologist". The funding was requested by the Florida Dept of Transportation, after the project was ranked as the highest priority transportation enhancement project for the 3-county area covered by the regional transportation agency. As such, the money went to the State of Florida. The money allocated is not for a "turtle tunnel" as has been widely circulated by Senator Coburn's 100 list. The tunnel part of the project actually represents less than 7% of the project cost. The main feature is the 2 miles of barriers that keep wildlife off the 4-lane divided highway. The impetus for this project is not to save a few turtles: rather, it's a major safety risk to humans. The roadway is being retrofitted to prevent human fatalities, which are very likely when motorists hit 10 foot alligators or 40 pound turtles in the middle of the night. Part of the problem, and why this project has received negative scrutiny, is that Senator Coburn (and his staffers) misrepresented this project to the public. He described it as a "13 foot turtle tunnel". Well, a standard lane on a highway is 12 feet. I'm not sure how Senator Coburn figured that 12 feet of tunnel could span a 4-lane divided highway. In reality, the under-highway culvert is 152 feet long (and there are 3 of them). But, again, these are only a very minor part of project (

Roger Belair
August 7, 2009 6:36 PM

cont'd Again, the tunnel part of the project only represents less than 7% of the costs. Senator Coburn also told the public that the project wasn't shovel ready, he said it wasn't fully funded, and he said it was only in the design stage. No wonder the media pundits seized on this project as a potential boondoggle. Once you know the real facts, the project takes on a different light. Not only does it save human lives, it gives work to 200 construction personnel for a year, and it has a strong environmental component. I can't think of a better win-win-win use of stimulus funds that have been allocated for road improvement projects. As the main artery from Interstate 10 and Georgia into Florida's capital city, the improvement of this infrastructure will help increase commerce traffic. Thank you for the opportunity to get the real information out there.

Timothy Page
August 10, 2009 7:21 PM

Mr. Belair, As the author of the above article, I would like to take a moment to expand on your recent comments concerning the construction of tunnels and barriers along US Route 27 in Florida. First off, I would like to thank you for voicing your opinion and posting the facts that you have. We here at OhMyGov! appreciate you, the readers, opinions and thoughts and are always excited to know that people out there are reading the material and take an active interest in newsworthy experiences. For me personally, it is a relief to know that there are still people out there who dig deeper into the facts, rather than just swallowing whatever is placed in front of them and calling it a day. Regarding your comment, the stimulus money was, of course, not given directly to biologist Matt Aresco. If citizens were able to get a slice of the stimulus pie then I myself would be squatting down on a gold toilet every night in the justification that it “helps me concentrate on doing my work.” However, we can thank him for the State being granted the money due largely in part to the work Aresco did in the field and the information he has compiled over the last decade concerning the ruthless slaughter of Florida wildlife due to the highway skirting Lake Jackson. I first caught wind of Aresco’s work in an article published on CNN.com which you can view at this link: http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/06/17/turtles.vs.taxpayers/index.html?iref=newssearch As you can see, Aresco is highly regarded as the fighter for the project that is now underway, but every project must go through procedure, in this case, State procedure. Now when it comes to Senator Coburn’s views on this matter, you can take it a few ways. Political deception was not a theme found in the article in question, but in all fairness to the Senators argument, it seems that now is just not the right time to proceed with a project such as Route 27’s. You mentioned that work would be available to 200 construction workers for a year, which is justifiable, but that is what Sen. Coburn is against. A lot of lawmakers have been going back and forth about stimulus projects and the jobs they will create, the biggest argument, how long the jobs will last. Even Aresco considers the fact that the jobs for the project will only last as long as it takes to finish the project, and Coburn is one who believes temporary work is futile in a time where our country needs stability. Going as far as to call the project “stupid” is Coburn’s problem, because you’re right, it is as much about wildlife safety as it is to human beings. As a country boy, I’ve seen and heard the damage that can occur from collisions with wildlife, and anything that can be done to limit these accidents is a basic concern for people’s well being. Honestly, we could go all day about stimulus decisions, but I only wanted to take a moment to clear up any concerns you may have had for the article here. Of course, OhMyGov! has dozens of stimulus-related articles that can be found with a simple search. Thank you again for taking the time to comment, and we look forward to more in future discussions.

 

         

 

 

                JOIN THE COMMUNITY!
 
 

 

Luigui: I laughed with this article. Illegal Immigrants are not accepted in the US. But the US sol...  more Matt Francis: I really hope they dont send anymore troops. I find that this war has dragged out so damn ...  more sick of lies: my mom has cancer was a nurse 30 years has 1 years for medicare and her retierment kicks i...  more

About OhMyGov!

The most fun government news has ever been...

Read More
Press Coverage

Site Tools

An array of helpful, fun features is coming soon!


Friends

We're on Facebook and Twitter: @OhMyGov
and @Bureaupat

See Our Partners