Web Statistics Obama to trannies: I've got your back - OhMyGov News

Follow OhMyGov! on  OhMyGov on Facebook     

  LOGIN  

Obama to trannies: I've got your back

By Jaime L. Hartman Jun 25 2009, 08:18 AM

President Barack Obama is quietly preparing to release new guidelines that would bar workplace discrimination against transgender federal employees. The New York Times reports the administration will add transgender people – those who identify their gender differently from the sex indicated on their birth certificates – to a list of other groups protected by anti-discrimination laws. The new guidelines will appear in an updated federal handbook distributed within the next couple of months.

President Bill Clinton added sexual orientation in 1998 to the list of protected categories that already included “race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicapping condition, marital status or political affiliation.” By adding transgender persons to the do not harass list, Obama may be closing the last obvious loophole for federal workplace protection, until of course someone claims discrimination for being overweight, or aesthetically or vertically challenged.

Some say the new guidelines are not necessary. The Library of Congress, which is not part of the Executive Branch and would not be affected by the President’s directive, recently lost a discrimination case following the withdrawal of a job offer after learning the candidate was undergoing a sex change operation. Despite transgendered individuals not being a protected class, the Library was found to have violated the plaintiff’s civil rights and had to pay $500,000 in lost pay and damages. In essence, the federal government ended up paying for the sex change operation and a lifetime supply of makeup.

John Berry, Director of Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the administration’s highest-ranking openly gay official, told The New York Times that he thought it was important to specifically clarify that they were protected from discrimination.

“I know they [transgender individuals] are present in the federal workforce, and they deserve to be treated with respect and dignity,” Berry said.

Statistics from the Diagnostic and Statical Manual IV states that about one in 30,000 males and one in a 100,000 females have identified themselves as having very strong transgender feelings. However, the number of those who act on those feelings is less know, despite a statistic that 2-3% of men engage in cross-dressing at some point. If we apply these statistics to the federal workforce of 2.7 million and assume equal numbers of male and female employees, we can estimate there are about 45 male and 14 female transgender individuals in the federal workforce today. Of course, being as though the federal sphere offers greater protections for workers from discimination, these number likely skew 10-20 percent higher.

After campaigning on promises to be a strong advocate of equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals, Obama is now being criticized for not moving quickly enough. Many LGBT activists are frustrated that Obama has not acted to repeal the military’s "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" policy, or pushed for overturning the Defense of Marriage Act, and are disappointed that his earlier move to expand federal employee benefits to same-sex partners did not include health insurance.

At the same time, conservative groups have expressed their unhappiness with what they see as a strong pro-gay agenda. The evangelical group Focus on the Family released a statement that said the new policy was unnecessary and criticized it as “government affirmation” of behavior it has defined as “one of many sexual sins that is outside God’s created intent and desire for us.” However, it's unclear whether he was talking about transgender workers or Congress in general.

 


Read More: Office Of Personnel Management (OPM), Pay And Benefits

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

Hazumu Osaragi
June 27, 2009 1:05 AM

First:  "Tranny', when applied to a car, is slang for transmission.  But 'tranny' when applied to a human being is derogatory and implies that the person so labeled is less than human.

Second: The article said "In essence, the federal government ended up paying for the sex change operation and a lifetime supply of makeup," which trivializes the the salary that was denied to COL Schroer by the wrongful actions of Library of Congress.

Third:  The figure of 1 in 11,000 was arrived at with little or no rigorous research -- and in fact may have been chosen for political purposes so as to minimise the issue.

Professor Lynn Conway has performed a more rigorous, repeatable and verifiable study in which she polled those surgeons who perform Gender Reassignment Surgery.  Based on the number of surgeries performed on male-bodied American citizens, she came up with a lower bound of 1 in 2,500 and an upper bound of 1 in 500 male-bodied American citizens between the ages of 18 and 65 have HAD Gender Reassignment Surgery.

Let's pick a number close to the lower bound -- say, 1 in 2,000.  That's 5 times more than the outdated figure of 1 in 11,000 this article quotes.

And it means there are at least around 150,000 male-to-female American citizens alive today.

How about 1,350 male-to-female transgender employees?  And the APA figures for female-to-male are even worse.  Trans-men (female to male) are a lot harder to spot.  They get deep male voices and grow beards and get male-pattern baldness.  They pass much better and are much harder to spot and count.

This article repeats innuendo, half-truths, misconceptions and some outright lies, presented in a snarky manner that denies the humanity of a transgendered person.   Please prepare for an onslaught.  Better yet, take this page down and turn off commenting.

Very respectfully;

Hazumu

Gerri
June 27, 2009 4:40 PM

That's nice...IF you are a Federal Employeee. But what about all the Transgendered people in the private sector? We are still fighting for our rights in the workplace, in housing, in jobs, and in every aspect of our daily lives. I feel lucky to be living in a midwestern city that has added us to their anti-discrimination statement. However, it didn't seem to apply to me at my former job (I left April 13th). After working there full time for three months, I was called into HR and told I could no longer used the women's restroom. For the next three months, I left the building at lunch time, drove to a nearby restaurant, used their facilities, and came back to work. But in April 2008, this restaurant closed its doors, and I went to a part time status, four hours a day, until April of this year. Gerri

 

          


 

                JOIN THE COMMUNITY!
 
 
 


 

 

 

 



  






 

About OhMyGov!

The most fun government news has ever been...

Read More
Press Coverage

Friends

We're on Facebook and Twitter: @OhMyGov
and @Bureaupat

See Our Partners


OhMyGov! Feeds