Follow OhMyGov! on  OhMyGov on Facebook

  JOIN  or  LOGIN    ALSO ON OMG! : GET SOCIAL
730640

Healthcare under Obama: Dispelling myths and setting precedents

By Olesia Plokhii May 04 2009, 10:00 AM

Don't confuse President Barack Obama's health care plan with national healthcare. Far from being universal-where citizens pay a small monthly or annual fee for quality public health insurance without ‘copays'-Obama is proposing to reform the existing private healthcare system that middle to lower class Americans have come to hate. 

The $50-$65 billion plan, which includes public and private insurance plans for Americans, is known as two-tiered healthcare.

"My plan begins by covering every American," Obama says in a ‘Blueprint for Change: Health Care' video on barackobama.com. "That's the commitment I'm making to you, the American people, and that's the plan I'll sign into law at the end of my first term as the President of the United States of America."

The Obama-Biden health reform will extend private health coverage to Americans in two ways: the plan will require insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions and will offer subsidies to those who cannot afford to pay their premiums.

"For the 45 million Americans who don't have health insurance, you will have health insurance that is available to you," Obama continued. "No one will be turned away because of a pre-existing condition or illness."

Perhaps the most anticipated and speculated part of Obama's plan is the establishment of a National Health Insurance Exchange that will include both private and public affordable health plans emulated on benefits available to members of Congress. The public health plan included in the Exchange would be a first of it's kind for the country.

"Everyone will be able to buy into a new health insurance plan that is similar to one that every federal employee from a postal worker in Iowa to a congressman in Washington currently has for themselves," Obama explained.

The public plan includes high quality coverage of all essential medical services including preventative, maternity, disease management, and mental healthcare transferable from job to job. The plan also includes a government health tax credit to small business owners who provide insurance to their employees.

"My health care plan won't impose a single new burden on small business," Obama promised. "Instead, we'll give them tax credits that will cover up to 50 percent of the cost of insuring their employees," he said, adding that small business owners will have access to purchasing coverage from a new low-risk insurance pool.

Obama's plan also gets tough on insurance companies by targeting monopolistic practice. Big Pharma that tries to prevent generic medicines from entering the market will be subject to government oversight, and corporations that don't offer coverage will be mandated to pay a portion of payroll toward employee health care.

In fact, much of the funding for the health reform is coming from the pockets of America's wealthiest.

"Barack Obama will pay for his $50-$65 billion health care reform effort by rolling back the Bush tax cuts for Americans earning more than $250,000 per year and retaining the estate tax at its 2009 level," the President's health reform website reads.

For those keen on keeping their current private insurance, Obama has promised to cut premiums by up to $2,500 annually, money that will be saved by investing in prevention, importing generic drugs, and implementing a digital-record health system that will cut administrative costs. With Canada already in transition mode to digitize their health records, Obama is looking into the future.  

According to The Guardian, Britain's National Health Service (NHS) -- providing universal healthcare since World War II -- is facing a 10 percent government-induced budget deficit this year that forces the crown corporation to cut costs of 15 billion pounds over the next 5 years. The NHS is tackling their budget woes in an unconventional way: 20 million pounds in incentives for anyone, from scientist to nurse to Joe Six Pack, who can invent new treatments for dementia or improving hospital hygiene.

With a two-tiered health care system that invests millions today in strategies to reduce preventable medical errors and passing legislation that requires hospitals to collect and report health care costs and quality data, the Obama administration is hoping to avoid having to play ‘who wants to be a millionaire' with nurses and instead save billions in the long-run.  

According to politico.com, President Obama will meet with Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, and Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Montana) Wednesday at the White House to discuss health care reform. Baucus and Grassley are two of the key players in engineering the Senate health care bill, which they hope to complete by June.  

Here's hoping we don't have to wait another three-and-a-half-years for a revision of the old system.

Get our Newsletter!
Click here to sign up and stay informed

 

Also Interesting:


 

Read More: U.S. Congress, Healthcare, Legislation, Others

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

johnmayer
May 13, 2009 6:21 AM

If you are uninsured and does not have insurance, you should check out the website uninsuredamerica.blogspot.com - John Mayer, California

Neal Keith
June 14, 2009 12:41 PM

Republicans and Democrats both need to get on the side of ordinary citizens and not big business if they want to be re-elected.

Richard Mallia
June 26, 2009 9:13 AM

One must not confuse health care with health insurance. Providers are being shut out of plans and limits are set to the number of specialists allowed on certain plans in certain places. Many insured are not getting health care because of deductables, copays, capitation limits, inability to have certain test done, etc. Health insurance only makes insurance companies rich and does not mean health care to the public.

Joshua Glickman
July 22, 2009 6:31 AM

When he says "Americans" does that include illegal immigrants?

Sara
July 22, 2009 4:09 PM

If this is supposed to be a two-tiered health care system, where ppl could keep their Health Insurance, then why does section 102 phase out private medical insurance ?!?!

Also, if the Gov't can run Health Care better then private companies, then why have over 100 Vets gotten the WRONG Cancer treatment by the VA (which is ran by the Gov't) as well as hundreds of Vets been affected with HIV once again by the VA... And now the Gov't wants to take care of ALL our Health care?!?! You've got to be kidding!!

Look at the UK - a 22 year just died b/c the Gov't turned him down for a liver transplant. I don't want the Gov't making that choice... b/c it's going to be COMPLETELY POLITICAL!!!

sickofthelies
July 23, 2009 10:06 PM

1 trillion dollar plan is a disaster. the last thing we need is more govt. Try to think of one thing the govt can do better than free enterprise business. Even the military works better with "contractors".If this is a good plan then lay it out and let everyone look it over for serveral months before they vote on it.

mary
August 9, 2009 5:03 AM

hi i am a bit confused on this new health care plan obamma is offering my mom said under obamma's health insurance plan the insurance will be denied to overweight people and smokers is that true or false?

thank you my ma thinks president obamma is like robin hood from sherwood forest that takes from the rich and gives to the poor i don't think the same way as my ma does.

i know there are bigger issues then passing a health care insurance policy like child abuse, neglect, and violence in homes schools and around society and people especially young kids who don't have food to eat since their parents used the money for drugs instead of buying food for their children.  even though i am an independent mary kay rep i still help donate to families that have no money to feed their young kids for various reasons i have been very generous this last yr and this yr with worthy donations at publix to feed a poverished family by purchasing a harry chaplin food bag to buy for a needy family so their children could have a decent meal in their area.

i have 2 nephew boys that will be close to teenage yrs when i'm in my 50's it really scares me thinking of my future ahead of me when everyone of my parents and older brother and his wife go to heaven  i will be responsible for my two nephews here to provide for until they become married or financially independent for themselves since i never married this will pose a challenge for me since i have limited mobility my self here in north naples fl but learning to accept it and move on with my life here on earth.

Daniel
August 11, 2009 4:38 PM

First of all, we already have free health care! Look at the DoD, Medicare, Medicaid, and other state programs! Secondly, if we can waste over 3 billion dollars a month in Iraq and Afghanistan, why can't we help out our own people? We waste so much money helping out Pakistan, Israel, and other countries that we could easily keep that money here and take care of Americans. And for those of you who think privitization is the answer, think again. The US DoD wastes Soldiers' money and taxpayers money paying civilians for the same thing a Soldier does for 3 times less the money. Contractors are being thrown a huge bone at the expense of our taxpayers. If you think private healthcare is so great, keep it. But if you have a family and can't afford health care, this plan gives you the ability to get care at a reasonable price. All the insurance companies want is to keep their bank accounts fat and shareholders happy. They don't give two cents about the people they supposedly provide "care" for. If anyone has a better idea to take care of our fellow Americans, then go for it. The poor and elderly have theirs. But the lower middle class has been neglected this whole time. It is time to take care of the people who make America go everyday!

anonymous
August 17, 2009 3:58 PM

A substantial amount of doctors make over $250,000 a year. But has anyone thought about why doctors earn so much? The USA has one of the most rigorous training programs for physicians in the world. Doctors must undergo 4 years of college, then 4 years of medical school, along with 3 to up to 8 or 10 years of training before becoming a full-fledged physician. That is up to 22 to 25 years of education, almost 1/3 to 1/2 of a lifetime for many people. And this school is not easy for most people. Students undergoing studies/training for becoming a physician learn extremely hard material and endure some of the most rigorous types of training in the whole world. One of the only ways that can compensate for this extreme amount of hard work is the reward of a good salary at the end.

If the salaries of doctors is lowered, it will decrease the incentive for a lot of people to become doctors. After all, they are spending 2 to 3 decades - at the prime of their life - studying when they could actually be making money like in most other professions. The amount of doctors (with this salary pay cut) will substantially decrease, therefore increasing the lack of doctors even more. If anything, this new health care plan can reduce the quality of healthcare in the US, even if it increases the quantity of people who are able to receive it. For example, many people who order tests such as MRIs and CT scans are able to get them within a week's time. In countries with national healthcare plans, these tests can't be done until up to 4 months, or 1/2 a year later! By that time, many of these patients can die or become even more sick. So what's the good in that?

Saymon
August 18, 2009 4:57 PM

In fact, much of the funding for the health reform is coming from the pockets of America's wealthiest. "Barack Obama will pay for his $50-$65 billion health care reform effort by rolling back the Bush tax cuts for Americans earning more than $250,000 per year and retaining the estate tax at its 2009 level," the President's health reform website reads.

cambria
August 27, 2009 3:21 AM

what did they mean by "...the Obama administration is hoping to avoid having to play ‘who wants to be a millionaire' with nurses and instead save billions in the long-run"? I am a nurse and that makes no sense. Nurses do the bulk of the work in hospitals and nursing homes, as advocates for their patients. In some situations the money is horrible, and if someone is doing it for the money they are not going to last long. If they were implying that nurses are only in it to make a buck then this is ridiculous.

 

         

 

 

                JOIN THE COMMUNITY!
 
 

 

pupusas: i think illegal immigrant should be here ..... i love pupusas  more Luigui: I laughed with this article. Illegal Immigrants are not accepted in the US. But the US sol...  more Matt Francis: I really hope they dont send anymore troops. I find that this war has dragged out so damn ...  more

About OhMyGov!

The most fun government news has ever been...

Read More
Press Coverage

Site Tools

An array of helpful, fun features is coming soon!


Friends

We're on Facebook and Twitter: @OhMyGov
and @Bureaupat

See Our Partners