Follow OhMyGov! on  OhMyGov on Facebook

  JOIN  or  LOGIN    ALSO ON OMG! : GET SOCIAL
722205

BREAKING NEWS: Report reveals White House attempted to influence Congressional elections

By Andrew B. Einhorn Oct 15 2008, 11:16 AM

A new report released today by the House Oversight Committee reveals that the White House orchestrated a huge, taxpayer-funded campaign to ensure Republican candidates were elected into office during the mid-term elections in November, 2006.

In an apparent violation of the 1907 Hatch Act - which strictly prohibits the use of public offices to influence the outcome of elections - the efforts were coordinated by the White House Office of Political Affairs, which used political muscle in an attempt to retain Republican control of Congress.

The report details the travel of thirty-two officials from 12 cabinet agencies and three independent offices to 35 states to make appearances with 99 Republicans running for election in 2006.  At least 185 of the 303 events that took place outside of Washington, D.C. were paid for with taxpayer dollars. In fact, emails were obtained by the Oversight Committee detailing conversations between cabinet officials about billing the taxpayer instead of the Republican party to save the party money. 

The White House Office of Political Affairs e-mailed the Department of Veterans Affairs to ask whether there was an "official component" to the Secretary's trip to Washington State in July to appear with Doug Roulstone, a non-incumbent Republican House candidate at a campaign event, explaining: "Needless to say, trying to save the campaign as much $$ as possible."

President Bush's first director of the political affairs office, Ken Mehlman, admitted to the House Oversight Committee that a "big part" of his job was to "help elect allies of the President."

Mehlman went on to inform the Committee that when he ran the political affairs office, he worked with Republican party committees to identify "vulnerable Republican members" as well as "battleground races, and States and places where they agreed the most help was needed."

In yet another defiance of the Hatch Act, the Office of Political Affairs provided at least 22 briefings to agency officials at either agency headquarters or in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building to coach them how to help Republican candidates win their elections. These briefings occurred against the advice of the White House Counsel, which suggested such briefings should occur after hours instead of during work hours.

 

Most Read

 

Read More: U.S. Congress, Careers, Others

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

wiggsdannyboy
October 15, 2008 12:19 PM

This comes as a surprise?

boo_radley
October 15, 2008 12:20 PM

Yawn. And so who is going to do what about it? More hearings? Will that cost the taxpayers more than the evil crimes they're investigating did? They're out of control and there's nothing we can do about it. Get used to if if you aren't already.

Larry Linn
October 15, 2008 3:55 PM

How can anybody be surprised that Bush used the taxpayer's money to promote, and support Republican Candidates?  After all, he has a documented history of using other people's money to finance his dreams which result in bankruptcy.  He bought an oil company, but couldn't find any oil in Texas. The company went bankrupt shortly after “I sold all my stock”.  He bought the Texas Rangers baseball team in a sweetheart deal that took land using taxpayer money. His biggest move was to trade Sammy Sosa to the Chicago White Sox. As Governor of Texas, he cut taxes and left the state of Texas with billions in borrowed money. When he became president, he inherited a surplus. Now, the country is on the verge of bankruptcy. When our leaders run deficits, they are raising taxes. Those ”leaders” just want their successors to present the taxpayers with the bill.

antifolkhero
October 15, 2008 7:21 PM

Impeach!

phillyharper
October 15, 2008 7:21 PM

I up modded you, but you don't get it do you? WHO is going to impeach him? This internet of ours has us under the illusion that we're connected, we are in mind, but not in body.

Who are you saying "Impeach" to? We're all on your side, we all understand that he should be impeached.

YOU need impeach him. You need to physically rally together all of your revolutionaries and actually get the job done.

Impeachment and change is not a spectator sport.

pizzas
October 15, 2008 7:22 PM

let's make a petition!

Liebre
October 15, 2008 7:22 PM

Good thing we can count on the Justice Department - legal guardians for the People.

Oh, wait...

MrDanger
October 15, 2008 7:23 PM

Time for a permanent office of independent investigators to oversee the executive with the power to arrest people and bring them to trial.

jcmcbeth
October 15, 2008 7:23 PM

It makes me wonder if anything will happen as a result of this. The efforts for the impeachment hearings of Bush and Dick Cheney, the firing of the U.S. attorneys, the white houses abuses of executive privilege to ignore subpoenas, and the loss of over a year of white house e-mails. What has been the result of any of this? If someone could point me to an recent investigation that has held anyone accountable with more than a slap on the wrist, i'd would be very interested to hear about it.

Dillenger69
October 15, 2008 7:24 PM

Can we add a filter to remove BREAKING NEWS from headlines as they are submitted?

Or maybe, make it twice the font size and blinky!

oconostota
October 15, 2008 7:24 PM

Gasp... The Bush administration? Break a law? The hell you say!

9/11/2001 is all I got to say about that.

uncreative_name
October 15, 2008 7:24 PM

Actually, they don't. From the wikipedia article on the Hatch Act.

   The original Act forbids intimidation or bribery of voters and restricted political campaign activities by federal employees. It prohibits using any public funds designated for relief or public works for electoral purposes. It also forbids officials paid with federal funds from using promises of jobs, promotion, financial assistance, contracts, or any other benefit to coerce campaign contributions or political support.

   The most restrictive measure was brought about by Republicans in the Senate. It dictates that persons below the policy making level in the executive branch of the federal government must not only refrain from political practices that would be illegal for any citizen but must abstain from "any active part" in political campaigns.

   An amendment on July 19, 1940 extended coverage to state and local employees whose salaries include any federal funds. This amendment also set an annual ceiling of $3 million for political parties' campaign expenditures and $5,000 for individual campaign contributions.

jmt123
October 15, 2008 7:25 PM

Why am I not surprised? Those guys are crooks and will do anything to keep themselves in power.

honestbleeps
October 15, 2008 7:29 PM

At first, my response was "uh, who is ohmygov.com and why should I believe anything at all that comes from it?"

Then I saw the first link in the article - a direct link to the report, hosted on house.gov ...

It's real -- just not being picked up on by CNN and the rest of the useless repeat-bots yet.

tgdvw
October 15, 2008 8:08 PM

As always, why is this not on the front page of major newspapers?

sconner
October 15, 2008 8:09 PM

Crime, after crime, after crime. Maybe that's why it's called the "criminal justice" system. Just a guess...

 

         

 

 

                JOIN THE COMMUNITY!
 
 

 

Melissa: " One of the things I would like to bring up is that fact that if we spend less than ...  more Melissa: " think it's ironic that the republicans and neocons who bitch the most about imm...  more Melissa: Illegals do so get free healthcare, they also get welfare which welfare PROVIDES medi-cal ...  more

About OhMyGov!

The most fun government news has ever been...

Read More
Press Coverage

Site Tools

An array of helpful, fun features is coming soon!


Friends

We're on Facebook and Twitter: @OhMyGov
and @Bureaupat

See Our Partners