shadow above body
Browse by...
left bar divider

Contact us

Tired of the waste and stupidity? Tell us what you've witnessed.

 

Government Blog Directory

General News

Market Crisis: Is Your Thrift Savings Plan Investment Safe?

As the Dow Jones industrial average tanked over 504 points yesterday, even the most conservative and passive of investors (read: TSP's G fund patrons) could not help but take notice. The worst market day since the 2001 terrorist attacks underscores the sense that Former Fed Chair, Alan Greenspan, stated over the weekend: we are in fact in a recession.

But what does that mean for government employees and military personnel invested in the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP)?

Even conservative investors are bound to see their retirement yields go down, at least until the market corrects; but the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board is crafting a contingency plan to keep the TSP running in the event of a firm collapse.

Currently, the assets of the G Fund are managed internally by the Board, while the assets of the F, C, S, and I Funds are managed by outside investment firm Barclays Global Investors. The F, C, S, and I Funds, each of which has a portfolio based on the composition of a market index, remain invested in Barclays funds regardless of the performance of the securities markets. The L Funds are invested in the five individual TSP funds based on professionally determined asset allocations.

However, the recent collapse of major firms like Bear Sterns, and now Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch, are raising the proverbial red flag for TSP and partner Barclays. In response, Gregory Long, TSP's executive director, continues to reinforce the message that if you have a long-term goal, you should have long-term plans. Even so, Long and the Board recognize that participants may benefit by buying equity funds when their value is low, a technique known as dollar cost averaging, which is intended to reduce exposure to risk associated with making a single large purchase.

The idea is simple: spend a fixed dollar amount at regular intervals (e.g., monthly) on a particular investment or portfolio/part of a portfolio, regardless of the share price. In this way, more shares are purchased when prices are low and fewer shares are bought when prices are high. The premise of dollar cost averaging is that the investor wants to guard against the market losing value shortly after making his investment. Therefore, he chooses to spread his investment over a number of periods.

So what's the best strategy? TSP is a long-term investment and market volatility will always exist. While stock values never really go straight up; they all rise and fall over time; it's all about risk management and risk tolerance. However, investors within four years of retiring could consider shifting money into the less risky G Fund. But for long term retirement investors, a panic response could wind up costing a lot of money. Your best strategy is to ride out the storm or purchase equities while prices are down - just think of it as a big Macy's sale that will end soon, albeit not soon enough.


Also Interesting:

Dear BureauPat: How can I get onto Employee Express to change my Thrift Saving Plan (TSP) allocation?
Tax Year 2008 - Maximize Your Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) Account
House looking to improve TSP
NEED TO KNOW: House Approves Mandatory Enrollment in Thrift Savings Program
Spike seen in TSP loans, emergency withdrawals
Congress asks for analysis of flexible work schedules
DC federal raises on par with private sector?


Published Sep 16 2008, 01:34 PM by OhMyGov! |  Email |  Print



Comments

TOM said:

Yes, you should be in for the long term. But what if the end of your long term investment is now.  Just retired and the ones taking the early out and moving their money, have lost big time and don't get a chance to rebuild.  A lot of stocks have held steady and a lot have of stocks have went up in value the last several years,  I am not sure, why such as the C fund has had a lost for a while.  It seems like the C fund has been invested in borderline stock, no name stocks.  I think TSP should relook at the investors and look at what type of stock they are investing in.  I can understand the current stockmarket troubles, but I see no reason why the C fund should be a constant loser.  Even if it is called a high risk C fund, why can't it be a high risk with stocks that are known to make a profit.  Maybe TSP should change investors, they certainly need to reexamine the investing process.

September 30, 2008 10:27 PM
Al said:

The C Fund is not "a constant loser" "invested in borderline stock." Over the last 5 calendar years from 2003 - 2007 it has an annualized return of 12.8% The C Fund is a S&P 500 Index very similar to any other S&P 500 Index from from Fidelity and Vanguard and as such has similar returns.

October 2, 2008 8:58 PM
Peaceful Gains said:

It's true that over the long term, stocks do (or did) go up. But that's not the whole story. The key question is, how long is the long term? Stocks today are *lower* than they were 10 years ago.

Instead of "buying and holding", you should consider the risk of the investment. When stocks have a lower risk, you should be in stocks. But when the risk rises, you should get out of stocks and get into something safer. For example, we've been completely out of stocks since mid-July. Following this strategy, you could make much more money than simply buying and holding stocks. What's more important, you could make that money with your account experiencing way less volatility.

October 24, 2008 4:52 PM

Leave a Comment

 (required)

 
 (optional)

 (required)

 
Add
Only @ OMG

OhMyGov! Poll:

COLUMNS:

On The Horizon - Future issues facing government.

A Day in the Life
- Follow the trials and tribulations of government employees.

 World Views - A glance at governing around the globe

 

right bar divider
Dear Bureau Pat

Dear Bureau Pat: My SF-50 states I'm Career Conditional. What does that mean?

Read More: Click here

 

 

       OhMyGov! T's
            Find Fun Stuff to Wear




right bar divider
Book Nook

OhMyGov! review:

Bob Schieffer’s America

 

 

A proud supporter of:

 

 

Add OhMyGov! to your website
Just click "get widget" below

 

Show some OhMyGov! love
Add us to your blog or website

 

 

Join us on
Click Me!
And get social with others

 

right bar divider
Ten Most Wasted

 2007's biggest tax wasters

#1 DOI Loses $10 Billion in Oil
Revenue
#2 Sen. Feinstein Sells Out to Hollywood
#3 DoD Blows $2.68 Billion

                                                         See All.... 

right bar divider
far right divider


 

 See All