Follow OhMyGov! on  OhMyGov on Facebook

  JOIN  or  LOGIN    ALSO ON OMG! : GET SOCIAL
711818

California eyeing high-speed rail to ease traffic and gas costs

By Briana Kerensky Jul 31 2008, 09:09 AM

With the reality of five-dollar gas on the horizon and the dependence on foreign oil, not to mention the carbon emissions belched by the millions of cars on the road, will California be the bullet train that leads the United States to a sustainable future?

Since 1996, the California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) has been pushing for the state to have a state-long, high-speed railroad system.  Considering that it takes the average driver six-plus hours to drive down the freeway from Sacramento to Los Angeles, public trains traveling 220 mph and carrying the projected 117 million passengers could rapidly reduce highway congestion and carbon emissions.

If built, the high-speed rail would stretch from Sacramento to San Diego and over to the San Francisco Bay Area with stops in major cites along the way, at an estimated cost of $45 billion. Already $60 million has been spent on pre-construction activities, such as environmental studies.

But by far, the hardest part of creating a high-speed line that will stretch from Northern to Southern California will be scraping together that $45 billion.  CHSRA expects 25 to 33 percent of the construction costs to come from the federal government.  The authority’s finance team also expects public-private partnerships to contribute an additional $4.5 to $7 billion. While that brings the financing roughly to $25.7 billion - just over half the required funds to complete the project - CHSRA is hoping that their efforts will get a boost from voters.  

In November, Californians will have the opportunity to vote for a Proposition 1 ballot initiative.  If approved, Proposition 1 would provide $9 billion for the first stage of construction - a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco, with about $1 billion for local-line upgrades and connections to the high-speed line.  

In spite of the high cost and lack of public awareness, people in California seem to be warming up to the idea of a high speed line that could green up the state.  A poll conducted by the Sacramento Bee revealed that 56 percent of those questioned said they would vote for Proposition 1 in November.  Perhaps history will repeat itself and the face of American transit will once again become the railroad.

Sample train travel times throughout the state. 

  • Burbank to San Francisco: Under 2 hours 35 minutes
  • San Jose to Los Angeles: Two hours 21 minutes
  • Sacramento to Los Angeles: 2 hours and 17 minutes
  • San Francisco to San Jose: 30 minutes
  • Riverside to Los Angeles: 33 minutes
  • Bakersfield to Los Angeles: less than 1 hour
  • Ontario to San Diego: less than 1 hour
  • Fresno to San Francisco Airport: just over an hour

Watch the video about the rail system.

 

Also Interesting: 

NEED TO KNOW: Government mileage reimbursement rate increased to 58.5 cents/mile!
Greening the Gov: Governments taking aim at plastic bags
Stop Driving So Fast, 81-Year-Old Senator Tells America
Going Postal Now Means Going Green
Bright ideas no longer represented by a light bulb

Read More: Energy And Environment, Others

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

jason48
July 31, 2008 8:26 PM

The author should do more investigation before publishing an article like this. The project is currently in trouble in the California legislature. AB-3034, a key amendment to the proposed bond measure at this point does not appear to have the needed support for passage. The State has a huge budget deficit to deal with and getting the voters at this time to approve an expenditure of $10 billion seems remote. If AB-3034 fails to pass and there is a deadline of Aug 14th, the original ballot measure will be presented to the voters. It has been severely criticized in a 35 page report, authored by the democrats (the major supporters of this project). The project is deeply flawed, with political interests in San Jose and San Francisco as well as down south in areas like Escondido that have managed to re-route the project from the most advantageous choices. In a few words, right now the project is a mess.

Tom West
August 3, 2008 7:12 AM

jason48 has missed crucial point: if the high-speed rail system isn't built, the tstate will have to spend a much larger amount of money on upgrades to airports and the highway system. Building HSR is the*cheaper* option - exactly what's needed to prevent budget issues.

BOB2
August 4, 2008 1:59 PM

The CHSRA is the unique political fiefdom of Quentin Kopp. The plan fir High Speed as it now stands is ludicrous, the work on it shoddy, only the needs are real. The CHSRA is and has been a useless organization more interested in patronnage for well connected planning firms, than an agency meeting any real state need, including passenger rail. It would be better to support SB 53 (Ducheny) and create a real and accountable California Intercity and High Speed rail agency. Tom I've worked with you, and I agree the need for effective rail passenger servcie in California is real. The problem is that the CHSRA is nothing but a political slop trough of the first order

Jay L. Tulock
August 4, 2008 10:54 PM

Tom, your idealism is appreciated.  What you don't want to know is that Bob and Jason are unfortunately correct.  High speed rail is a great idea.  The Authority, however, is an unguarded kingdom that big-time government-money-sucking consulting firms are drooling over just the thought of suckling on the taxpayer bosom.  I hate to see our current chance at high speed rail die, but ironically it is the fastest way to get a decent system built.  They say it is $1 billion/year in inflation to wait, I say kill the project and save tens of billions in cost lawsuits from environmental and neighborhood groups and the cost of dredging through central valley cities and running trains at 225mph (a real energy suck) to transverse their too-long and politically-haggled route.  Kopp, Diridon & Moreshed should be given awards for pissing into the wind and telling everyone they have figured out how to end the drought.

 

         

 

 

                JOIN THE COMMUNITY!
 
 

 

jeffrey a.: these people are like locusts,they take everything and move on,i wonder how much money lea...  more Education Tay: Good to see Ecofont as I would say ink in any cartridge is harmful to the environment. The...  more Melissa: " One of the things I would like to bring up is that fact that if we spend less than ...  more

About OhMyGov!

The most fun government news has ever been...

Read More
Press Coverage

Site Tools

An array of helpful, fun features is coming soon!


Friends

We're on Facebook and Twitter: @OhMyGov
and @Bureaupat

See Our Partners