shadow above body
Browse by...
left bar divider

Contact us

Tired of the waste and stupidity? Tell us what you've witnessed.

 

Government Blog Directory

General News

VA of two minds when it comes to voting help for veterans

The Department of Veterans Affairs looks after the health and well-being of those who once served the country. Does this mandated care also extend to assisting veterans in the voting process?

Actually, it does. According to a Department of Veteran's Affairs directive issued last May, the department is responsible for helping "patients who seek to exercise their right to register and vote."

But the department has been heavily criticized recently by politicians and voters' rights groups who find current VA policies to be more of a hindrance than help.

The department recently banned third-party organizations from holding registration drives in all federally-run nursing homes, homeless shelters and rehabilitation centers, troubling many officials across the country.

"It just seems wrong to the league that the VA is erecting barriers to voter registration for our nation's veterans," Mary G. Wilson, president of the League of Women Voters told the New York Times. "They appear to be using technicalities to block many veterans from registering to vote."

This sentiment has been echoed by numerous senators, secretaries of state, and advocates of voter's rights from groups like the American Association of People with Disabilities (AAPD) and Common Cause.

"There is no reason why the Department of Veterans Affairs should not proactively assist veterans in exercising their right to vote. To do otherwise is an insult to the sacrifices these men and women have made for our country," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). "It's time the Department of Veterans Affairs reverse its directive and allow these non-partisan, third-party organizations into VA facilities to register veterans to vote."
Feinstein, along with fellow Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI), Chairman of the Veteran's Affair Committee, sent a letter to VA Secretary James Peake urging him to end the prohibition on non-partisan voter registration at VA facilities.
But Peake refuses to budge. According to the Daily Record, Peake recently reaffirmed the VA's stance, citing concerns about "patients' rights, disruption of operations and involvement in partisan political activities."

The VA references the Hatch Act in its justification for the ban. The Hatch Act prohibits federal employees from participating in partisan political actives on official time or on government property.

However, opponents say that the Hatch Act does not validate the VA's argument whatsoever. The act only prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan activities, freeing them to help with nonpartisan voter registration drives. Additionally, the act does not ban third-party organizations from running registration drives.

"No veteran who has defended freedom and democracy overseas should experience democracy denied here at home," Kerry said. "We must support voter registration for veterans in every way possible, including allowing assistance from nonpartisan registration organizations.  Impeding voter registration in any way insults the ideals our veterans fought for in uniform, and that's something the Department of Veterans Affairs cannot stand for."

But the department also raises other concerns with running registration drives, insisting that these events could direct attention away from the primary goals of these facilities---looking after veterans.

Matt Smith, a VA spokesman, told the New York Times that the department "wanted to ensure that our staff remains focused on caring for our veterans instead of having to determine the political agenda of each group that might try to enter our facilities."

The VA also insists that it already has programs in place to facilitate the registration and voting process for the hundreds of thousands of patients that check into their facilities each year. However, voter's rights advocates, like Jim Dickson and Joe Davis still say that registration drives are necessary. "Veterans with disabilities have a harder time registering to vote through state agencies, so we call on Secretary Peake to help," Dickinson, the vice president of the AAPD, told the Daily Record.

"Voting is an American right," Davis, a spokesman for the VFW, told USA Today. "Why the VA would not want to help fellow Americans exercise that right is a puzzle."

Yet, VA officials have continued to deny organizations the right to hold registration drives. And Senators Akaka, Kerry and Feinstein are merely a few of the people who find something wrong with that.

"Right before the Fourth of July, Connecticut's Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz attempted to provide voter information and register residents at a West Haven Veterans Affairs facility," they wrote in their letter to Peake. "Secretary Bysiewicz was denied entry to the VA facility under the VA's Directive.  Instead she sought to register veterans leaving the facility.  One such veteran who was registered to vote by the Secretary was Martin Onieal, 92, a World War II veteran.  Mr. Onieal told her ‘There was nobody here to do this last year.'  That is simply unacceptable."







 

 


Published Jul 24 2008, 10:45 AM by Joseph Rendeiro |  Email |  Print



Comments

Pat Smith said:

There is already a small fire burning at the VA and you want to add fuel/politics to it?

Please do not refer to this as partisan politics. Veterans are of different race, color, creed, religions and political parties.

If the veteran is not already registered he or she can do so upon their release, if they are registered they can use the absentee ballot.

Can anyone see how the VA is actually protecting the rights of these injured veterans while they are hospitalized in their care? After an out-patient operation or just a mild sedation to have teeth extracted the patient beforehand has to sign a paper which tells them not to sign their name to any documentation, make any financial decision or even drive a vehicle for the next twenty-four hours.

These injured patients at the VA are more than likely on many various medications, which in turn would allow them to be more easily persuaded to sign their name to something they would normally not agree with. So in essence the VA is protecting the rights of the disabled and medicated veterans staying at the VA under their care and protection.

Look at how heated an argument on politics can get just on-line. Face to face in person I have watched actual fights break out, and right or wrong the security police at the VA has better things to do than stop an actual fight over someone's political opinion. At times there is enough bickering going on at the VA, why would anyone want to add politics to the fire?

I just wish that over medicated outpatient veterans had the same protection when it comes to signing loans from predatory lenders and car salesmen/politicians.

Why is it that at election time many are suddenly worried about the veterans in the nursing home not being able to vote?  When I was able to volunteer there I was worried by some of the conditions there and said how many deserved to die with much more dignity.  The same applies to the 200 thousand or more homeless veterans, let’s get them a real address (home) first then register them to vote.

Also think of the somewhat already tense working environment of the VA employees – nurses, doctors, management etc watching over the patients – and many individuals do have an inclination to express their political beliefs especially during an election – politics does not belong in a working environment, especially one as diverse as the VA and one where many are on various medications.  All the employees especially in a MEDICAL facility need to focus on their job which is the patients care and well-being not politics.

After the Gulf war as a political science major I participated in a few voter registration drives and it was never the students doing the registering that caused the problems.  The stress of a very heated over-heard or worst yet witnessed argument over politics can contribute to a life altering mistake by an otherwise good employee.

Something easier to consistently be worked for (even after this election) would be for something more simple and bi partisan like a voter registration card to always be placed in the patients room like the bible use to be and can then be made a part of the normal cleaning ritual after each patient is released and the room is then readied for the next new patient.  Simple, consistent and bi partisan.

As a disabled female veteran I used my VA benefits to obtain a BA in the BS of political science. I am compelled to help our new veterans receive a comfortable, productive future they so rightly deserve.    

July 26, 2008 7:00 AM

Leave a Comment

 (required)

 
 (optional)

 (required)

 
Add
Only @ OMG

Write for Us!
Speak your mind, make a difference

Get our Newsletter!
Click here to sign up and stay informed

 


right bar divider
Dear Bureau Pat

Dear Bureaupat: How do I write effective KSA answers?

 

 Read More: Click here

right bar divider
Book Nook

OhMyGov! review:

Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful

 

By Beth Simone Noveck

 

 

A proud supporter of:

 

 

Add OhMyGov! to your website
Just click "get widget" below

 

right bar divider
Ten Most Wasted

Missing Government Items


right bar divider
far right divider


 

 See All