An all-new OhMyGov! is here...

  JOIN  or  LOGIN    ALSO ON OMG! : GET SOCIAL
051909

Federal vs state worker wages: who's making out better?

By Andrew B. Einhorn Jul 09 2008, 10:57 AM

If you've ever sat at your desk, staring into your computer screen while daydreaming about a better government job, you're not alone.  Most of us, at one point or another, become put off by our work, coworkers, bosses, and just generally get bored or sick of the workplaces we're in.  It is human nature. 

If you're considering a change of pace, you may want to consider the following: federal employees are paid better than state employees.  Some of you may know this already, but the differences in pay might just surprise you.

Looking at the chart below easily outlines the large pay differential between state and federal salaries.  Adjusted for inflation, federal employees are now making, on average, $25,000 more per year than the average state employee.  Adding insult to injury, federal salaries have continued to increase over time, while state salaries plateaued in 1990 and, accounting for inflation, have actually started to slowly decrease. 

 

Inflation aside, average wages for federal and state workers have continued to increase over time, although federal salaries have always remained higher.  However, in recent years, as the graph below shows, the absolute salary differences between federal and state workers have become more pronounced recently.  The pay gap is wider. 

The reason for this stems from the fact that nearly every state requires its annual budget to be balanced at the end of the year, unlike the federal government, which has no qualms about going into debt with the Chinese and Saudis to avoid curtailing spending habits.  During tough budgetary times, state salaries are often the first thing to suffer, as governors freeze wage increases to combat rising debt.  

So the next time you're thinking about a career change, keep in mind the economic situation.  If times are tough and you don't have any moral objections to taking a pay raise when the national debt is rapidly approaching $10 trillion, the federal employ is for you.

Read More: U.S. Congress, Careers, Business And Economy, Others

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

Adam
July 9, 2008 2:15 PM

I find this to be a pretty simplistic explaination, and a pretty unwarrented dig on federal employees. Just as a reminder, there are about 535 members of congress who decide each year what the pay raises of fed employees are, both military and civilian, so if your so opposed to the modest (on average 3.3%, at or just under yearly inflation) raise fed employees get, I suggest you write to your congressman to express your disdain. In the meantime I suggest you re-write this article, adjusting for inflation (as you noted in the article, you convienently left that out) and add in the number of military families currently recieving food stamps because their government doesnt pay them a living wage. Furthermore, I will make sure to send this article to one of my civilian superiors who volunteered to go to NYC on September 12, 2001 to respond to the vast human need concerns, only now to suffer from chronic breathing issues, which he wont see a penny for, and hasnt complained once. I am sure he will appreciate being told he is earning too much for all the "other duties as required" we federal employees meet when the nation needs our service. Would also like to see you factor in heath care benefits and other work schedule options, you might find some state benefits out weigh fed benefits, or at least put them on par. And it would be nice to see the cost of living adjustments factored into your "research" as a fed may make 20,000 more to work in NYC, but all that cash typically goes straight into cost of living. In more simplistic terms (following in the footsteps of this article), don't hate the player, hate the game (and if you really care, bark up a tree that matters)!

Jim
July 9, 2008 2:36 PM

Hold on there....seems an unfair critique given the straight facts presented that feds make more money that state employees. No surprise there since the feds have a strong lobby and complain more than state workers like myself. I often wonder why I get paid less for the same amount of work. And as a VA employee, there is no locality pay if you work in Richmond or Arlington where everything is more expensive. You have to negotiate a higher salary. No one hands it to you on a silver platter. Quit bitching. locality pay all goes to living expense - it is meant for that not to line your greedy pockets. As for benefits, I'd love to see that study done too bc it would show the feds making tons more than the staties.

Andrew B. Einhorn
July 9, 2008 2:51 PM

Both good points. You might be interested to know that the Cato Institute determined federal employee avg wages to be in excess of 100,000 per year when benefits are factored into the equation. Benefits vary widely state to state, so it's hard to do the same kind of study. But certainly a good idea we will try to take on. On a cursory review, I saw federal benefits easily topping the states I looked at, particularly when the TSP matching benefit was fully utilized. VA only matches $40 month vs thousands per year for TSP. I certainly am not discrediting anyone who enters public service and gives extra time; I'm simply pointing out that there is a pay difference between state and federal workers and that state salaries get hit by economic downturns, unlike federal salaries. Yes, Congress votes up the fed salaries each year, but that doesn't make it right to do so without compensating for the increase with decreases in spending elsewhere or increasing revenues. There's only so much debt we can take on before collapsing like the housing market. Do we really want the federal government to follow suit? I think not.

Dan
July 10, 2008 10:25 AM

A few points: The federal workforce has a large number of technical employees in a variety of fields -- econ, math, sciences, ect... That said, state employees have taken the brunt of the 'never pay any taxes' movement. 17 years without a raise is disgusting when you consider that the US economy, productivity, and everything else has grown so much since. Telling people that they can always have more for less is flat-out dishonest. If you want services, you have to pay for it. Sorry. If you want to complain about fed employees pay, please try to buy a house near DC. You'll find $70,000 doesn't actually get that far in DC. And, if you are making $70k in the gov, you almost certainly have a degree and 5-15 years of experience (depending on field) -- which is right where private workers are.

Ben
July 10, 2008 10:59 AM

I'm two years out of college and make 60,000 per year - considerably more than my friends make at the 35K private sector jobs. And to be fair, I'm not that talented. I just negotiated for a high salary and was promoted quickly from GS-7 to GS-9.

chris: one already exists www.totalrecallinfo.com  more SJ Suber: Create an independent exclusive personal barcode system that when an item is scanned at ac...  more Woodrow: Amazing technology, with nothing but wild claims and anecdotal evidence to back it up. The...  more

About OhMyGov!

The most fun government news has ever been...

Read More
Press Coverage

Site Tools

An array of helpful, fun features is coming soon!


Friends

We're on Facebook and Twitter: @OhMyGov
and @Bureaupat

See Our Partners