shadow above body
Browse by...
left bar divider

Contact us

Tired of the waste and stupidity? Tell us what you've witnessed.

 

Government Blog Directory

General News

Utility or Useless: The Air Force's New Battle Uniform

The United States Air Force is now geared up with its own unique distinctive camouflage battle dress uniform, the Airman Battle Uniform (ABU).  It is currently in full production with various contracts in excess of $20 million annually.  But the complaints about it are piling up.


As with any important acquisition, like the F-22 and the controversial refueling aircraft, years of evaluation and tests starting as early as 2003 led the Air Force to perform a combined initial fit and wear test for their new utility uniform in 2004.  After months of "wear testing" through 2005, a new uniform suited for the United State Air Force was selected.

In a nod to the tradition of the Air Force's involvement in Vietnam, it adopted the Vietnam-era blue and grey tiger stripe pattern - though some say this is a misplaced nod since it was the Army Special Forces that was best known for wearing tiger stripe fatigues during that time.

Much more important than aesthetics is functionality and some experts contend that its fractal camouflage pattern works best under indoor office lighting and tends to wash out somewhat in full sunlight.  This might be good for pencil pushing Airmen hiding out from their commanding officers, but it's probably not what the designers had in mind.

According to the Air Force, Airmen feedback was considered throughout the process, but OhMyGov! identified only a few of the functional recommendations made by Airmen in the field that were implemented into the uniform.  In fact, this new uniform has been a subject of many complaints from Airmen returning from duty in Iraq and Afghanistan who had been wearing the U.S. Army-issued Army Combat Uniform (ACU) as a temporary issue uniform.

Specifically, they complain that the thickness of material of the ABU and the larger interior pockets makes it much too warm in desert conditions. To avoid overheating, Airmen have been cutting the pockets out of the inside of the blouse and have been authorized to roll up their sleeves.  Additionally, many complain of a lack of storage space and a low ease of use with government issued body armor.

"The uniform appears to be great if the US was to invade Siberia, but it's especially unfortunate that people have to wear the damn things in the 120-plus degree heat imminent over here," said one Airman in the field.

"[The ABU is] a great uniform to wear in a home station, air-conditioned office, but not outdoors, in the Middle East, in combat," said another Airman. "It doesn't breathe or let air circulate anywhere near as well [as the summer battle dress uniforms]."

Due to the complaints, the Air Force has gone back to the drawing board again, developing a lightweight and more comfortable ABU to wear in their support of missions in the Middle East.

The ABU was authorized for wear by all Air Force personnel as of November 2006 to replace both the temperate and hot weather Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) and Desert Camouflage Uniform (DCU) and is standard issue for new Airmen at Basic Military Training. 

It remains to be seen whether there will be a lightweight version of the ABU available by 2011, the phase out date of the Air Force's current BDU, said Maj. Brad Head, branch chief of the Air Force Uniform and Recognition Branch.

Perhaps by then we will have concluded our operations in the Middle East and moved on to the Arctic Circle.  If so, Airmen will go in comfort.


 


Published Apr 21 2008, 06:00 AM by seniorexec |  Email |  Print



Comments

JAMES said:
BWHAHAHAHAHAHA I remember when they had us send comments, even before they began production most of us hated the new uniforms design and look. but the top brass wanted it. I refuse to purchase one good thing im out in 5 months. I feel bad for the people who are staying in.
April 21, 2008 8:35 AM
Ryan said:

The Airman Battle Uniform is a joke... I've been wearing it for the last 6 months in Iraq and it is nothing short of awful.  Like the article says, it is extremely hot!  The material is pretty much identical to thick jeans... imagine being in the Iraq desert where is 120F wearing a jean jacket, thick jean pants, boots and a hat - it is excruciating!  

What's worse is that the Air Force leadership just loves to create more and more rules and no we are restricted from even taking our blouse off unless we are performing heavy work outdoors -- and they mean HEAVY work such as construction.  So the rest of us who work out side for most of the day are forced to wilter away drinking distilled water all day.

That addresses the heavy part... the next mistake which goes way beyond the material was the idea to every create the thing to begin with.  All of you who have been in for at least 5 years can remember them putting out that awful bright blue uniform - many complained that the color was ridiculous to which the general's replied, "We're not looking for something that will camouflage with an environment, we only want it to be distinctive".  I can remember our shop sitting in commander's call looking at each other saying "WTF?!!?  Then why is it camo pattern!?!?"  If I wanted bright blue camouflage I'd go to Gadzooks at the mall.  Fortunately that got thrown away -- but doesn't this show where our leadership's head is?  It's not focused on the war fighter... its about looking different and another star for some general up top.

And the ultimate fruition of this mess is that AF leadership never thought that maybe having a distinctive uniform in a war zone could be a problem... terrorists aren't idiots... when they see 20 guys in ACUs and 2 guys in ABUs, they always shot at the Air Force guys.  So -- surprise!  What was the fix?!  Everyone who goes off base must now where the Army's uniform!  So much for the ABU being an Airman 'Battle' Uniform...

The Army's Combat Uniform (ACU) is far superior to the AF's as well.  The fabric flame retardant, very light, Velcro everything, it zips up, has arm and slanted chest pockets.  What is unbelievable is that the Army created this awesome uniform before the Air Force completed theirs and the AF didn't take any of their good ideas.

I could go on -- but from first hand experience the ABU is a complete waste of money and is a joke in the field.  All of us long for the days of DCUs and BDUs........

There have been so many problems lately with the Air Force (security, pt gear, etc.)

Oh Air Force........................................... where are you going.......

July 15, 2008 2:01 AM
diana said:
Let's also consider the exorbitant cost of R&D for this damn thing. We were AT WAR when we started this, then they poured...how much into developing a new "distinctive" uniform? And for WHAT? To be distinctive. That's it. It was going to fit better--it had male and female sizes--and it would be more utility-driven. These were good goals. But why couldn't we simply adopt the Marine or the Army uniform? Because ours had to be "distinctive." Why? It just did. That was the whole point of that SEVERAL MILLION we poured into R&D (and still are, apparently, because we failed with the first several mil to take little things like uniform breathability and body armor accessibility into account WHILE WE'RE EMBROILED IN A DESERT WAR IN WHICH PEOPLE ARE BEING BLOWN TO BITS. And some forward-thinking officers have dared to complain that the AF leadership is "out of touch." WhatEVER gave them that idea? Right now, The AF is test-driving new blues uniforms, as well. Why? I'm not sure, but I'll go out on a limb and say they're probably looking for something "distinctive." Or maybe distinctiver. Jeez. The army has no monopoly on high-ranking idiocy, that's for sure. d
September 14, 2008 11:19 AM
Hugh Morris said:
The airman battle uniform is only authorized to wear anywhere except in BATTLE! There is ANOTHER uniform for that. My question is why not just adopt the DCU, a uniform that has already been tried and tested with an ample supply to go around? But then the reality sets in and I begin to think that makes way too much sense what was I thinking...
February 10, 2009 2:31 PM
Anonymous1234 said:

I was in the Army and the Air Force and I believe the best solution would be to just adopt the Army Uniform.  The only thing wrong with it is the stupid looking velcro on the arm.  Not only does it look retarded, it gets caught on the tent every time you walk in and out of the TOC.  Once they get rid of that, it would be perfect.

February 19, 2009 2:44 AM
Afrotcclassof2010 said:

I'm not a big fan of ABU pattern, but ACU is not much better.  The Marines got this one right but not trying to have one uniform for all environments.  ABU and ACU both aren't that great.  

February 22, 2009 9:23 PM

Leave a Comment

 (required)

 
 (optional)

 (required)

 
Add
Only @ OMG

Write for Us!
Speak your mind, make a difference

Get our Newsletter!
Click here to sign up and stay informed

 


right bar divider
Dear Bureau Pat

Dear Bureaupat: How do I write effective KSA answers?

 

 Read More: Click here

right bar divider
Book Nook

OhMyGov! review:

Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful

 

By Beth Simone Noveck

 

 

A proud supporter of:

 

 

Add OhMyGov! to your website
Just click "get widget" below

 

right bar divider
Ten Most Wasted

Missing Government Items


right bar divider
far right divider


 

 See All